Engineering
Building Scalable Microservices with Node.js and Kubernetes
Learn how we scaled our platform to handle millions of requests using microservices architecture, Node.js, and Kubernetes.
# Building Scalable Microservices with Node.js and Kubernetes
When we hit 1 million users, our monolithic architecture started showing cracks. Here's how we rebuilt our platform using microservices.
## The Problem with Monoliths
Our Django monolith served us well initially, but we faced:
- 30-minute deployment times
- Single point of failure
- Inability to scale individual components
- Technology lock-in
## Microservices to the Rescue
We broke down our application into focused services:
### User Service
```javascript
// user-service/index.js
const express = require('express');
const app = express();
app.get('/users/:id', async (req, res) => {
const user = await getUserById(req.params.id);
res.json(user);
});
app.listen(3001, () => {
console.log('User service running on port 3001');
});
```
### Order Service
```javascript
// order-service/index.js
const express = require('express');
const app = express();
app.post('/orders', async (req, res) => {
const order = await createOrder(req.body);
await publishEvent('order.created', order);
res.json(order);
});
```
## Kubernetes Configuration
Here's our deployment configuration:
```yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: user-service
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
app: user-service
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: user-service
spec:
containers:
- name: user-service
image: myapp/user-service:latest
ports:
- containerPort: 3001
env:
- name: DATABASE_URL
valueFrom:
secretKeyRef:
name: db-secret
key: url
```
## Service Mesh with Istio
We use Istio for:
- Traffic management
- Security
- Observability
- Policy enforcement
## Monitoring and Observability
Our stack includes:
- **Prometheus**: Metrics collection
- **Grafana**: Visualization
- **Jaeger**: Distributed tracing
- **ELK Stack**: Centralized logging
## Lessons Learned
1. **Start with a monolith**: Microservices add complexity
2. **Automate everything**: CI/CD is non-negotiable
3. **Invest in observability**: You can't fix what you can't see
4. **Design for failure**: Services will go down
5. **Keep services small**: If it takes more than 2 weeks to rewrite, it's too big
## Performance Results
After migration:
- **Deployment time**: 30 minutes → 5 minutes
- **Availability**: 99.9% → 99.99%
- **Response time**: 200ms → 50ms
- **Infrastructure cost**: Reduced by 40%
## What's Next?
We're exploring:
- Service mesh migration to Linkerd
- GraphQL federation
- Edge computing with Cloudflare Workers
- Serverless functions for event processing
## Conclusion
Microservices aren't a silver bullet, but for our use case, they provided the scalability and flexibility we needed. Start simple, measure everything, and evolve your architecture based on actual needs, not hype.
Have questions about our architecture? Drop them in the comments!
Comments (1)
Leave a Comment
D
David Kumar
Excellent breakdown of microservices architecture! We're considering a similar migration. How did you handle data consistency across services?